Notes from a California naturalist

The nature of Nature

Menu
  • About me
  • Contact me
Menu

Thar she blows!

Posted on 2015-09-162023-01-06 by Allison J. Gong

Let’s just get this out of the way: I live in a paradise of natural beauty. Sometimes I still can’t believe that I get to call this gorgeous place my home. However did I get so lucky?

Case in point. For the last week or so a juvenile humpback whale has been hanging out in a small cove right off the road that winds along the coast in Santa Cruz. Several of my friends had shown me pictures and video of it, but every time I went out I got skunked. I saw lots of seabirds, though, and that itself was pretty amazing.

Mitchell's Cove in Santa Cruz, CA. 16 September 2015 © Allison J. Gong
Mitchell’s Cove in Santa Cruz, CA.
16 September 2015
© Allison J. Gong

Pelicans (Pelecanus occidentalis) and Caspian terns (Hydroprogne caspia) plunge-diving? Check. Common murres (Uria aalge) in the air and hanging out on the surface of the water? Check. Attempted kleptoparasitism by a gull on a tern that had caught a fish? Check. That was really cool. Oddly, though, I didn’t see any sooty shearwaters today.

This past Saturday I went down to Mitchell’s Cove and saw some amazing seabird behavior. The pelicans and terns were both plunge-diving, and then being mobbed by gulls and other hangers-on every time they came up with a fish. And in the background there was an unending stream of shearwaters flying from right to left.

I love how the pelicans fly along above the surface, then fold their wings and transform into arrows before shooting into the water. Good thing they don’t have nostrils, isn’t it? The terns do the same thing. Through the binoculars I watched the terns looking down for prey before committing to a dive; from what I could see they almost always came up with a fish.

The aforementioned humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) was putting on a show this morning for the local humans. I wandered down at about 08:45 on my way to the marine lab. There were about 40 people scattered on the beach and along the side of the road. I settled myself on a rock with my camera and binoculars at hand. It took only a couple of minutes to see this:

Humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) lunge-feeding at Mitchell's Cove in Santa Cruz, CA. 16 September 2015 © Allison J. Gong
Humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) lunge-feeding at Mitchell’s Cove in Santa Cruz, CA.
16 September 2015
© Allison J. Gong

Judging by size, this whale appears to be a juvenile. It was swimming just beyond the surf break, where the water was shallow enough that I could see the ripples just beneath the surface as the whale swam by. In this 2-minute video, the whale surfaces to breathe a few times and takes two lunging mouthfuls of fish and water before turning away and heading to slightly deeper water.

If I didn’t have an actual job to do, I could have stayed out there longer, just to keep observing all the action. As it was, my arrival at the marine lab was delayed by about 40 minutes. Oh well. But I didn’t have any time-crucial tasks or meetings this morning so nobody’s schedule was affected except my own, and if I can’t take advantage of serendipitous sightings like this then what’s the point of living in paradise?

Share this:

  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • More
  • Share on Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...

Happy as a . . .

Posted on 2015-09-142015-09-24 by Allison J. Gong

. . . clam, right? Yes, except in this case the bivalve is not a clam, but a scallop. I was out at the harbor with Brenna again this morning, looking for molluscs for tomorrow’s molluscan diversity lab. Brenna was hunting for slugs, of course, and had drawn up a rope that had been hanging in the water for god knows how long. Neglected ropes like this are the stuff of dreams for people like Brenna and me, as all sorts of animals recruit to and colonize them. Hauling one up is like going on a treasure hunt.

Two of the animals that had attached to the rope were small kelp scallops, Leptopecten latiauratus. The smaller of the two was about the size of my thumbnail and the larger was about 1.5 times that size. Their shell patterns are very beautiful:

The larger rock scallop (Chlamys hastata) collected at the Santa Cruz Yacht Harbor. 14 September 2015 © Allison J. Gong
The larger kelp scallop (Leptopecten latiauratus) collected at the Santa Cruz Yacht Harbor.
14 September 2015
© Allison J. Gong

The smaller rock scallop (Chlamys hastata) collected at the Santa Cruz Yacht Harbor. 14 September 2015 © Allison J. Gong
The smaller kelp scallop (Leptopecten latiauratus) collected at the Santa Cruz Yacht Harbor.
14 September 2015
© Allison J. Gong

But really, you don’t get a feel for how much fun these animals are until you watch them. Scallops are the most animated of the marine bivalves. They have eyes and sensory tentacles along the ventral edge of the mantle, and react strongly to stimuli. They can clap their valves together so quickly that they actually swim. I wasn’t able to make either of mine swim, but did get to watch them for a while.

The whitish object waving around on the left side of the frame is the scallop’s foot. Rock scallops are not permanently attached to surfaces (if they were, they wouldn’t be able to swim!) but they do use the foot to stick. If they find a spot they like, they try to wedge the dorsal, hinged area of the shell into a crevice.

Just like you and me, scallops have bilateral symmetry, complete with left and right sides. Unlike you and me, however, their bodies are laterally flattened and entirely enclosed between the left and right shells. The only parts of the body that extend from between the shells are the foot and the sensory structures on the mantle edge. Leptopecten has many long filament-like sensory tentacles, and brilliant blue eyes.

I thought I’d provoke a reaction by passing my finger over the animal and casting a shadow over it. Nada. But then it closed its shells a couple of times for no reason that I could discern. However, as my graduate advisor Todd Newberry used to say, The Animal Is Always Right™, and what doesn’t seem like anything to me could very well be a threat to a scallop.

And by the way, I did also collect a few slugs and a chiton for tomorrow’s lab. The highlight for me, though, was the scallops. I hope my students are as captivated by these little bivalves as I was!

Share this:

  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • More
  • Share on Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...

Off with the old, into the new

Posted on 2015-09-072023-01-06 by Allison J. Gong

The Seymour Marine Discovery Center, where I spend some time hanging out several days a week, has a spiny lobster (Panulirus interruptus) on exhibit. While the lobster doesn’t have an official name, for obvious reasons the aquarists call it Fluffy. We don’t know if Fluffy is male or female, but for convenience sake we’ve been referring to it as ‘he’ which may or may not be sexist, depending on one’s point of view. Fluffy came to the Seymour Center as a full-grown adult in September (I think) of 2012 and has molted every year close to the anniversary of his arrival.

Fluffy, the spiny lobster (Panulirus interruptus) on exhibit at the Seymour Marine Discovery Center. 7 September 2015 © Allison J. Gong
Fluffy, the spiny lobster (Panulirus interruptus) on exhibit at the Seymour Marine Discovery Center.
7 September 2015
© Allison J. Gong

Fluffy’s latest molt occurred some time between Saturday afternoon and this morning, probably in the dark of night. The molt remains in the tank, to show visitors what happened.

Spiny lobster (Panulirus interruptus) on the right and its molt. 7 September 2015 © Allison J. Gong
Spiny lobster (Panulirus interruptus) on the right and its molt on the left.
7 September 2015
© Allison J. Gong

Being encased in a rigid exoskeleton, all arthropods grow in stepwise fashion, increasing in size only during that brief period between when the old exoskeleton has been shed and the new one has hardened. Once they reach full adult size they may continue to molt yearly, but no longer grow. Fluffy’s exoskeleton may be hard by now, and to the naked eye he doesn’t look any larger than he was before. Then again, if he was already full-grown when he came here, I wouldn’t expect him to grow much, if at all.

When crabs and lobsters molt, the old exoskeleton splits apart at the junction between the carapace and abdomen. The animal slips out backwards through the split, leaving the entire covering of its body behind. Before molting the lobster’s epidermis would have resorbed some of the minerals from the old cuticle, and what is left behind is much thinner and more fragile than it was when the animal was wearing it.

Molted exoskeleton of a spiny lobster (Panulirus interruptus). 7 September 2015 © Allison J. Gong
Molted exoskeleton of a spiny lobster (Panulirus interruptus).
7 September 2015
© Allison J. Gong

In the photo above you can see the split between the carapace and abdomen. I think it’s amazing how the legs, eye stalks, and antennae can slip out of the old cuticle without being broken or damaged. However, until the new exoskeleton has fully hardened the animal is vulnerable and usually hides out for a few days. Fluffy may not eat until tomorrow or the next day. One interesting note. A lobster’s gills, being external structures, are covered by a thin layer of cuticle and are molted along with everything else. If you come across a recent crab molt, lift up the carapace and you might be able to see where the gills are located. How cool is that?

Share this:

  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • More
  • Share on Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...

A series of unfortunate events

Posted on 2015-09-042023-01-06 by Allison J. Gong

Now is not a good time to be a sea star in my care. Although to be honest, I doubt these animals would be better off in anybody else’s care, either. And what’s going on today isn’t so much a series of unfortunate events as a trio of additional episodes in the two-year serial catastrophe that we call sea star wasting syndrome (SSWS).

Episode 1: My third Leptasterias star finally bit the dust today, a full week after the first one tore itself into pieces. Yesterday I was teaching all day and didn’t have time to take pictures when I checked on things at the lab, but the star was intact. Today, not so much:

Leptasterias sp. star exploded due to SSWS. 4 September 2015 © Allison J. Gong
Leptasterias sp. star exploded due to SSWS.
4 September 2015
© Allison J. Gong

On Monday, four days ago, the star had a small lesion on the aboral surface of its central disc. It was crawling around and aside from the lesion appeared healthy. While this individual survived longer than the other two, the progression of SSWS from small lesion to total dismemberment is surprisingly rapid. I shouldn’t be surprised, as I’ve watched SSWS take apparently healthy Pisaster ochraceus stars and turn them into piles of rotting disembodied arms in a single day. That was almost exactly two years ago. Maybe it’s something about the Labor Day holiday.

Episode 2: Since I lost two of my bat stars (Patiria miniata) to SSWS back in July, I’ve been keeping an eye on the five that remain. They seemed to be doing fine until this week, when I noticed that one of them had developed a lesion. It was a very small superficial lesion on Monday but now it has grown both larger and deeper.

Patiria miniata (bat star) with small lesion. 4 September 2015 © Allison J. Gong
Patiria miniata (bat star) with aboral small lesion.
4 September 2015
© Allison J. Gong

Here’s a brief note about sea star anatomy. The small inter-radial clean-edged pale orange structure located at 6 o’clock is not a lesion. That is the animal’s madreporite, the ossicle through which water passes in and out of the water vascular system. The madreporite of Patiria tends to be pretty conspicuous; in other species it can be more difficult to find.

The lesion is the larger, paler, fluffier bit that doesn’t have clean edges. It’s an open wound, and the white fluffy stuff is the star’s soft tissue. Today the wound measures about 1 cm across its widest dimension:

Lesion on aboral surface of Patiria miniata. 4 September 2015 © Allison J. Gong
Lesion on aboral surface of Patiria miniata.
4 September 2015
© Allison J. Gong

I’ll keep checking on this star and see how quickly the lesion grows.

Episode 3: Scott and I have had to accept that we aren’t having much luck growing up our tiny Pisaster stars. This afternoon we counted 16 of the 0.5mm orange dots that are juvenile stars. We consolidated 12 of them into a single jar and kept the other four in a bowl with a piece of mussel shell. We have failed to determine what it is they eat when they’re this small, unless it’s more than sheer luck that the four with the mussel shell haven’t experienced any mortality in two weeks. And yes, we will continue to change the water in the jar and the bowl twice a week.

For broadcast spawners such as Pisaster ochraceus, which shed gametes into the water, reproductive success is all about numbers–numbers of spawning individuals in a population as well as numbers of gametes produced. In our experiment the numbers just weren’t working in our favor: (1) we got usable quantities of gametes from only two females and two males; (2) fertilization success was pretty low for both crosses (Purple x Purple and Orange x Orange); (3) all embryos for the Orange x Orange cross died in the early developmental stages; and (4) settlement and metamorphosis success was low for the Purple x Purple cross survivors. And now we’re down to 16 stars. By this time next week we may be down to zero stars, although those four on the mussel shell might still be hanging on.

We knew going in that the crux of the problem would be feeding the juveniles; I was reasonably certain that we’d be able to get through the larval stages successfully. And this is indeed what has been the case. Right now I feel more than a little disheartened even though the result we got (i.e., we can’t get the damn things to eat once they metamorphose) is far from unexpected. Fortunately it will be months before our brood stock can be spawned again so I have lots of time to decide if it would be worthwhile to try the experiment again. I will need to come up with some new ideas of what to feed the juveniles.

Share this:

  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • More
  • Share on Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...

You are what you eat, part the third

Posted on 2015-09-022023-01-06 by Allison J. Gong

To recap:  Way back in January I spawned some sea urchins. The resulting progeny are now almost 7.5 months old, counting from the day that they were zygotes. Once they metamorphosed and became established as post-larval urchins in June, I divided them into three feeding treatments:  the kelp Macrocystis pyrifera, the green alga Ulva sp., and a red coralline alga. Since then I’ve been counting and measuring them monthly, and today I completed the fourth data collection.

I could tell by looking at the bowls that the Macrocystis and Ulva urchins continue to grow much more quickly than the poor urchins stuck on the coralline diet. The Macrocystis urchins are, overall, bigger than the Ulva urchins, despite the qualitative observation that the Ulva urchins appear to be eating more. However, I am not monitoring the amount of food that is eaten by any of the urchins.

Test diameter of juvenile sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus) as a function of diet. 2 September 2015. © Allison J. Gong
Test diameter of juvenile sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus) as a function of diet.
2 September 2015.
© Allison J. Gong

In the past month I lost almost half of the coralline urchins; I’m down to six. Mortality for the other groups remains low. I think the Macrocystis and Ulva urchins have for the most part gotten big enough that, barring any unexpected disastrophe (yes, I made up that word), they shouldn’t experience much mortality.

Population sizes of juvenile sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus) as a function of diet. 2 September 2015. © Allison J. Gong
Population sizes of juvenile sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus) as a function of diet.
2 September 2015.
© Allison J. Gong

In terms of color, I think the differences between the Macrocystis and Ulva diets have become more pronounced in the last month. Today I tried to photograph the two groups of urchins under the same lighting conditions, with mixed success. There’s some variation within groups, of course, but overall the Macrocystis urchins have a more golden color on both the test and the spines. . .

Juvenile sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus) eating the kelp Macrocystis pyrifera. 2 September 2015. © Allison J. Gong
Juvenile sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus) eating the kelp Macrocystis pyrifera.
2 September 2015
© Allison J. Gong

. . . whereas the Ulva urchins have more purple coloration:

Juvenile sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus) eating the green alga Ulva sp. 2 September 2015 © Allison J. Gong
Juvenile sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus) eating the green alga Ulva sp.
2 September 2015
© Allison J. Gong

And, just to make sure that I hadn’t inadvertently biased the light in favor of one group at the expense of the other, I manhandled all of the urchins to one side of their respective bowls and took a picture of the two bowls side by side. Let me tell you, it was like herding cats. I’d get one group all bunched together then start working on the other, and the first ones would immediately begin wandering away from where I’d put them. This is the best shot I managed to get. Without reading the caption, you can still figure out which group is which, right?

Juvenile sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus) feeding on Macrocystis (left) and Ulva (right). 2 September 2015 © Allison J. Gong
Juvenile sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus) feeding on Macrocystis (left) and Ulva (right).
2 September 2015
© Allison J. Gong

We’re coming into the time of year when it might be difficult obtaining food for these urchins on a regular basis. Everybody may have to go on a diet for a few months. As long as I can get my hands on both Ulva and Macrocystis I’ll keep feeding them, and when I run out of one food the other group will have to fast also. I think they’re well enough established by now that not having unlimited food won’t do much harm.

I just had another thought. I could put the Ulva and Macrocystis urchins back on coralline rocks and see how they do over the winter. Something to think about.

Share this:

  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • More
  • Share on Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...

Spying on filter-feeders

Posted on 2015-08-302023-01-06 by Allison J. Gong

Late yesterday afternoon I met my friend Brenna at the harbor to go on a slug hunt. Brenna is working on the taxonomy of a group of nudibranchs for her dissertation, and we’ve gone collecting out in the intertidal together a few times. I knew I’d need some harbor therapy after teaching a microscope class in the afternoon so when she suggested a slug hunt I didn’t have to think twice about saying “Yes!”

I arrived at the harbor before Brenna did, and spent some time lying on the docks taking pictures of the fouling community that lives there. The late summer afternoon light was perfect for picture taking, and I got some great shots.

Mussel (Mytilus sp.) at the Santa Cruz Yacht Harbor, 29 August 2015. © Allison J. Gong
Mussel (Mytilus sp.) at the Santa Cruz Yacht Harbor, 29 August 2015.
© Allison J. Gong

This is one of my favorites. It’s a view into the posterior end of a live mussel (Mytilus sp.). Mussels live inside a pair of shells and open up only the posterior end to suck in water for respiration and filter feeding. They shut the shells very quickly when disturbed, so I had to sneak up on this individual and take a picture before it knew I was there. Looking through the opening you can see a blurry pale structure running from left to right; I think this is the mussel’s gill. The elaborately fringed dark structure that looks like a pair of curtains extending towards each other is the edge of the mantle. Because most of the mussel’s body is enclosed within the shells, the mantle edge contains most of the animal’s sensory organs. Mantles are exquisitely sensitive to touch, light, and certain chemicals; scallops, another type of bivalve mollusk, often have actual eyes on the mantle edge.

In addition to spying on mussels, I also tried to catch polychaete worms off-guard. There are several different types of tube-dwelling polychaetes living at the harbor. Most of the ones I saw yesterday were serpulids living in meandering calcareous tubes. Like these:

Serpulid polychaete worm at the Santa Cruz Yacht Harbor, 29 August 2015. © Allison J. Gong
Two examples of Serpula columbiana, a tube-dwelling polychaete worm, at the Santa Cruz Yacht Harbor, 29 August 2015.
© Allison J. Gong

Polychaete worm tubes come in many different materials and morphologies. These serpulids live in calcareous tubes that snake over surfaces. Because the tubes are mineralized, they can extend upwards from a surface, too. The worm spends its entire post-larval life in the tube that it secretes, extending only its “head”, visible as a tentacular crown, for filter-feeding. Like the mussels, serpulid polychaetes are very quick to respond to anything they perceive as a threat. Even a mere shadow passing over them can cause a rapid retreat into the tube finalized by sealing off the tube with the trumpet-shaped operculum.

One of the most conspicuous animals at the harbor is an invasive encrusting bryozoan, Watersipora subtorquata. This animal is one of the first to colonize new real estate. Nothing else looks like it, so it is easy to identify.

Watersipora subtorquata, an introduced bryozoan at the Santa Cruz Yacht Harbor, 29 August 2015. © Allison J. Gong
Watersipora subtorquata, an introduced bryozoan at the Santa Cruz Yacht Harbor, 29 August 2015.
© Allison J. Gong

Watersipora grows as a crust on surfaces such as mussel shells and floating docks, but when two colonies meet they use each other as surfaces, forming these curling sheets. The faint fuzziness that you see sort of hovering above the surface of the sheets is due to the lophophores extending from the zooids. Here’s a closer shot:

Watersipora subtorquata, an introduced bryozoan at the Santa Cruz Yacht Harbor, 29 August 2015. © Allison J. Gong
Watersipora subtorquata, an introduced bryozoan at the Santa Cruz Yacht Harbor, 29 August 2015.
© Allison J. Gong

Another of the common introduced species at the harbor is the colonial sea squirt Botrylloides violaceus. This animal comes in a wide range of oranges and even purple. Here’s a colony that seems to understand the visual impact of pairing high-contrast colors:

Colony of the colonial sea squirt Botrylloides violaceus growing over mussel shells at the Santa Cruz Yacht Harbor, 29 August 2015. © Allison J. Gong
Colony of the colonial sea squirt Botrylloides violaceus growing over mussel shells at the Santa Cruz Yacht Harbor, 29 August 2015.
© Allison J. Gong

What looks like a mass of pale orange doughnuts is actually a strictly organized colony. Each of the doughnuts is a zooid, and the hole of the doughnut is the incurrent siphon through which the zooid draws water in. Each zooid has its own incurrent siphon. In this photo you can see several larger holes; these are excurrent siphons, shared by several zooids, through which waste water is expelled. It’s difficult to see in the photo, but the excurrent siphons are raised up above the level of the colony, so water that has already been filtered doesn’t get sucked in again. This is exactly the reason that human structures such as smokestacks and chimneys are tall.

Oh, and since you asked, Brenna did indeed find slugs! And she taught me some field characteristics to help me ID slugs that I find. We both got what we needed on our little jaunt to the harbor.

Share this:

  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • More
  • Share on Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...

Hanging on

Posted on 2015-08-30 by Allison J. Gong

Day 3 of wasting in Leptasterias

The saga continues. When I checked on my ailing stars yesterday I saw, as expected, that most of what I had called Leptasterias #1 (the pink star that had ripped itself into pieces the day before) had disintegrated into small piles of mush. There was no sign of life in any of the small fragments so I threw them away. The largest piece, consisting of two adjacent arms attached to what looks like most of the central disc, was still walking around so I kept it. Today I was surprised to see that it hasn’t died yet. In fact, it looks a little better, with both of the arms active and the central disc appearing to be somewhat more contracted and less sloppy.

Remnant of wasting Leptasterias star, 30 August 2015. © Allison J. Gong
Remnant of wasting Leptasterias star, 30 August 2015.
© Allison J. Gong

The two arms appear to be working together, rather than trying to walk away from each other. I think this is a good sign, although it’s too early tell how much longer this fragment of a star will survive.


The star I had designated Leptasterias #2, which had the very large lesion on Friday, had died and dissolved into a mass of amorphous tissue and skeletal ossicles when I looked at it yesterday.


On the other hand, Leptasterias #3, the larger of the two gray stars, seems to be holding its own, or at least not getting any worse. On Day 1 of the outbreak this star had a small fluffy lesion on its aboral surface. Today the wound appears to have grown a bit but its edges look a little cleaner:

Leptasterias star affected by wasting syndrome, 30 August 2015. © Allison J. Gong
Leptasterias star affected by wasting syndrome, 30 August 2015.
© Allison J. Gong

This star was particularly active this morning. I didn’t want to disturb it or give it any incentive to autotomize its arms, so I left it in its screened container to take pictures and video. It was zooming around and acting, for all intents and purposes, like a normal healthy star.

Fingers crossed that this one makes it!

Share this:

  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • More
  • Share on Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...

Whiskey Tango Foxtrot

Posted on 2015-08-282015-08-29 by Allison J. Gong

Sometimes the only word that will do is a bad word. I generally try not to use a lot of bad language because on the occasions when I do swear I want my f-bombs to really mean something. Late this afternoon I was on my way out of the lab when I made a quick last trip through the wet lab just to make sure everybody would be okay for the night, when out of the corner of my eye I saw a few odd pink bits in one of my screened containers.

This container held three small six-armed stars of the genus Leptasterias. I had collected them earlier this summer with the goal of showing them to my students when we do the echinoderm diversity lab at the end of the semester. Stars in this genus are interesting because their normal arm number is six and they brood their babies instead of broadcasting gametes into the sea to meet, fertilize, and develop on their own. Plus, like all their echinoderm kin, they are pretty animals. Lastly, enamored as I am of oddballs and out-of-the-ordinary things, I am charmed by Leptasterias‘s six arms because most stars have only five.

So when I opened up the screened container and saw that one of my Leptasterias stars had torn itself into pieces, I let fly with a few f-bombs and other choice expletives. I removed the star pieces into a bowl for a better view.

Leptasterias star dismembered due to wasting syndrome, 28 August 2015. © Allison J. Gong
Leptasterias star dismembered due to wasting syndrome, 28 August 2015.
© Allison J. Gong

Seeing a star that had ripped its own arms off is every bit as horrifying when the star has six arms as when it has five. This act of self-mutilation had probably occurred today, as the star looked fine when I checked on it yesterday. All of the pieces were still alive and crawling around:

Actually, if you examined each of the pieces independently and didn’t know that it was only part of a greater whole, you’d think that they were entirely viable. I put these pieces aside in a separate bowl, although honestly I don’t know why. I’m almost certain they’ll be dead when I check on things at the lab tomorrow morning, and even if they aren’t they’ll be decomposing while still sort of alive, which is even worse. I must be a glutton for punishment.

For a while I held out a teensy glimmer of hope that the other two stars might be okay, but that didn’t last long. It took only a glance to see a big aboral lesion on the center of one of them:

Leptasterias star with large aboral lesion, 28 August 2015. © Allison J. Gong
Leptasterias star with large aboral lesion, 28 August 2015.
© Allison J. Gong

Examination under higher magnification shows just how deep and intrusive these lesions are. The body wall is entirely compromised, resulting in the exposure of internal organs to the outside environment.

Lesion on aboral surface of Leptasterias star, 28 August 2015. © Allison J. Gong
Large lesion on aboral surface of Leptasterias star, 28 August 2015.
© Allison J. Gong

It turns out that none of these Leptasterias is unaffected. The third star in my container has a small aboral lesion:

Small aboral lesion on Leptasterias, 28 August 2015. © Allison J. Gong
Small aboral lesion on Leptasterias star, 28 August 2015.
© Allison J. Gong

Whether or not this third individual will survive is up for grabs, but I wouldn’t bet on it. From my experience with wasting syndrome in Pisaster and Pycnopodia, the disorder progresses extremely rapidly once the animal starts showing signs of illness. And all of these animals appeared just fine yesterday. The small pink star is essentially dead already, it just hasn’t realized it yet. The gray star with the large lesion may very well be dead tomorrow, too. The star with the small lesion might still be alive tomorrow, and this is the only one for which I have a bit of hope for survival.

About a week ago the seawater temperature dropped to 16°C for a few days, but then started creeping back up; today it topped out at 19°C. Correlation is not causation, but I do wonder if another spike in the 19-20° range, on top of stress caused by the ongoing period of warm water, is the proverbial straw that broke the camel’s back. These poor stars have gone through hell lately, and there’s no indication that the water will cool off any time soon. I’d throw up my hands and ask, “What’s next?” but I have a sneaking suspicion that I’ll find out soon enough.

Share this:

  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • More
  • Share on Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...

A plug, and a caveat

Posted on 2015-08-262023-01-06 by Allison J. Gong

Early next week (31 August – 2 September), PBS and the BBC are going to present a huge “live” media event. I say “live” because although the event will be aired in the evenings, all the preview footage I’ve seen has been shot in during daylight hours. Anyway, you can read all about it in the press release.

Big Blue Live, as it is called, is a collaboration among the Monterey Bay Aquarium, NOAA, and both media networks. I can guarantee that there will be some spectacular footage of wildlife within the Monterey Bay. You know, whales, dolphins, seals and sea lions, and perhaps the odd bird or two. This is the stuff of wildlife, the so-called charismatic megafauna, that have warm bodies and look at you with big eyes.

My concern, as a perennial fan of the overlooked and underappreciated, is that the whole media event will focus only on these large mammals (and maybe a bird and possibly even a fish), and neglect or give short shrift to the countless fascinating and ecologically crucial critters that form the lower trophic levels. In other words, the invertebrates. Not to mention the organisms that ultimately produce all of the food in the marine trophic system, the phytoplankton. I expect that there might be lip service paid to the phytoplankton, krill, and baitfish which are the reason that the whales and such come to Monterey Bay, but I will be pleasantly astonished if more than a few seconds of air time are devoted to them. Somehow it’s just not easy to make diatoms sexy to lay people, even those who say they love marine biology.

Thus, anticipating that my beloved invertebrates won’t get much mention, I’m going to post some of my favorite pictures of them here, as I photographed them in the field. And as you’re watching Big Blue Live, keep in mind that there’s more to (wild)life than charismatic megafauna.

Pisaster ochraceus in tidepool at Natural Bridges State Beach, 17 June 2014. © Allison J. Gong
Pisaster ochraceus in tidepool at Natural Bridges State Beach, 17 June 2014.
© Allison J. Gong
The vermetid snail Thylacodes squamigerus at Pistachio Beach, 18 January 2015. © Allison J. Gong
The vermetid snail Thylacodes squamigerus at Pistachio Beach, 18 January 2015.
© Allison J. Gong
Juvenile sea star at Davenport Landing, 19 January 2015. © Allison J. Gong
Juvenile sea star at Davenport Landing, 19 January 2015.
© Allison J. Gong
Octopus rubescens in a tidepool at Natural Bridges State Beach, 4 May 2015. © Allison J. Gong
Octopus rubescens in a tidepool at Natural Bridges State Beach, 4 May 2015.
© Allison J. Gong
Henricia sp. at Point Pinos, 9 May 2015. © Allison J. Gong
Henricia sp. at Point Pinos, 9 May 2015.
© Allison J. Gong
Hespererato vitellina, the appleseed erato snail, at Point Pinos, 9 May 2015. © Allison J. Gong
Appleseed erato snail (Hespererato vitellina), at Point Pinos, 9 May 2015.
© Allison J. Gong
Kelp crab (Pugettia producta) on the beach at Franklin Point, 31 July 2015. © Allison J. Gong
Kelp crab (Pugettia producta) on the beach at Franklin Point, 31 July 2015.
© Allison J. Gong
Mouth of Anthopleura sola at Natural Bridges State Beach, 6 April 2015. © Allison J. Gong
Mouth of Anthopleura sola at Natural Bridges State Beach, 6 April 2015.
© Allison J. Gong
The brittle star Ophiothrix spiculata at Franklin Point, 31 July 2015. © Allison J. Gong
The brittle star Ophiothrix spiculata at Franklin Point, 31 July 2015.
© Allison J. Gong
The anemone Anthopleura artemisia at Davenport Landing, 2 August 2015. © Allison J. Gong
The anemone Anthopleura artemisia at Davenport Landing, 2 August 2015.
© Allison J. Gong

Share this:

  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • More
  • Share on Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...

Chasing the bloom

Posted on 2015-08-212023-01-06 by Allison J. Gong

Having read multiple news accounts of domoic acid (DA) events up and down the Pacific coast of the U.S., I decided to do my own informal survey of the culprit that makes DA. Domoic acid is a naturally occurring toxin that is produced by some (but not all) species of the diatom Pseudo-nitzschia during a plankton bloom. It is ingested by filter-feeding animals such as mussels and anchovies and gets passed to higher trophic levels as these animals are themselves preyed upon. The filter feeders are thought to be unaffected by the DA they ingest, but due to bioaccumulation the toxin occurs in higher concentrations in the tissues of the predators. Humans can be affected by DA also, when they eat contaminated shellfish, for example. This is why coastal states advise seafood foragers not to collect and eat bivalves (clams, mussels, oysters) when DA is detected in the water. When humans are sickened by domoic acid, the affliction is called Amnesic Shellfish Poisoning (ASP).

I had originally hoped to collect a sample from a boat over deeper water, but when those plans failed to materialize I did the best I could on my own:  I went out to the end of the Santa Cruz Municipal Wharf and threw the net from there. As soon as I hauled the net back up I could smell the diatoms. Yes, diatoms have a smell, as does just about anything when you concentrate it enough. The diatom smell is rich and organic, but not at all unpleasant.

This is what the sample looked like:

All those clear needle-like things are chains of Pseudo-nitzschia cells. When they are reproducing quickly (a.k.a. “blooming”) the cells remain connected by their tips (see below). Longer chains indicate favorable conditions for asexual reproduction in diatoms; I saw some chains that were 12+ cells long. The small whitish things zooming around are barnacle nauplii. Obviously barnacles are having lots of sex right now.

Pseudo-nitzschia is a pennate diatom, which simply means that the cells are pen- or boat-shaped. Some of the pennate diatoms have a raphe, or slit-like opening on the frustule through which a tiny bit of protoplasm can be extruded. These diatoms, of which Pseudo-nitzschia is one, don’t swim but can actually scoot around on surfaces. Don’t believe me? Then watch this long chain of Pseudos move back and forth like a train on tracks.

Here’s a still shot at higher magnification:

Cells of the pennate diatom Pseudo-nitzschia sp. 21 August 2015. © Allison J. Gong
Cells of the pennate diatom Pseudo-nitzschia sp. 21 August 2015.
© Allison J. Gong

See how the individual cells remain connected to each other by their overlapping tips? Each of the cells is about 75 µm long and contains two roughly rectangular chloroplasts that are golden brown in color.

Pseudo-nitzschia wasn’t the only diatom in the sample, either. I saw surprising numbers of Coscinodiscus, a genus of centric diatoms, ranging in size from 160-250 µm in diameter. Coscinodiscus frustules are beautifully sculptured, making the cells look like fancy buttons.

Cells of the centric diatom Coscinodiscus sp. 21 August 2015. © Allison J. Gong
Cells of the centric diatom Coscinodiscus sp. 21 August 2015.
© Allison J. Gong

That little bleb at about 10:00 on the larger diatom is a dinoflagellate, Peridinium or Protoperidinium, that came along for the ride. There is also a chain of Pseudos making a cameo appearance in the bottom of the photo.

The other unusual diatom in the sample was Chaetoceros. This diatom has a name that hints at the morphology of the cells:  “chaet-” is Greek for “spine” or “bristle”. Indeed, the cells of Chaetoceros are box-shaped and have four long spines that link adjacent cells together to form chains.

Cells of the centric diatom Chaetoceros sp. 21 August 2015. © Allison J. Gong
Cells of the centric diatom Chaetoceros sp. 21 August 2015.
© Allison J. Gong

The intriguing question that came to my mind was “Why now?” Around here I’ve grown accustomed to a typical succession of phytoplankton in Monterey Bay, with diatoms (especially Chaetoceros) blooming in the spring and early summer, corresponding to our usual upwelling season, then giving way to dinoflagellates in the late summer and fall when upwelling abates. And yes, we did have a major Pseudo-nitzschia bloom back in April and May. Diatoms bloom in response to high levels of nutrients, especially nitrate, that occur when upwelling returns nutrients to surface waters. We did have a few weeks of decent upwelling in the spring. Then El Niño started to build and we went through several weeks of warm, clear water when diatoms were pretty much absent and we saw phytoplankters such as silicoflagellates and coccolithophores, which can thrive in waters that are too nutrient-depleted for diatoms.

And now the diatoms are back. Chlorophyll levels in nearshore waters are high right now all along the central California coast. These data are from CeNCOOS, an ocean observing system:

Chlorophyll concentrations along the central California coast, 17-19 August 2015. © CenCOOS
Chlorophyll concentrations (µg/L) along the central California coast, 17-19 August 2015.
© CeNCOOS

Assuming that the chlorophyll being measured is in the cells of Pseudo-nitzschia and other diatoms, it appears that we’re having a return to springtime conditions. Bait fish are back in the Bay, and following them are dolphins and birds. I would dearly love to do some whale watching this fall; we may have another spectacular season for humpback whales. Whatever the cause for this apparent late-season rebirth, this autumn is shaping up to be interesting.

Share this:

  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • More
  • Share on Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...
  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • …
  • 42
  • Next

Categories

  • Bees
  • Birds
  • Field trip
  • General natural history
  • General science
  • Marine biology
  • Marine invertebrates
  • Photography
  • Travel
  • Uncategorized

Tags

algae beach bees bird birds citizen science cnidarians crustaceans desert drawing echinoderms ecology field trip fire fish forest gastropods herps hiking insects larvae mammal marine biology marine invertebrates microscopy mollusc molluscs mountains mushrooms natural history nature journal photography plankton plants river rocky intertidal sea stars sea star wasting sea urchins sponges teaching travel vertebrates weather worms

Recent Posts

  • Six months, and a big return 2026-01-02
  • Five weeks 2025-08-12
  • Afternoon mystery 2025-07-22
  • What to do in Vegas when you don’t “do” Vegas 2025-02-21
  • Spying on the hunter 2025-01-15
April 2026
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  
« Jan    

Archives

© 2026 Allison J. Gong
All material mine unless otherwise specified  

©2026 Notes from a California naturalist
Notes from a California naturalist
Contact me / Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: MinimalistBlogger.
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d